The use of post office boxes (PO boxes) by individuals or companies can pose a challenge in legal and investigative scenarios. Identifying the actual physical location or ownership details of a party hiding behind a PO box is crucial for various investigative purposes, including skip tracing and fraud prevention. In this video transcript, we’ll delve into three methods frequently employed for obtaining ownership or contact information in such cases. It’s imperative to note that the legality of these methods may vary, and seeking legal advice before proceeding is paramount.

1. Requesting Box Holder Information from the Postmaster:

The first method involves filing a formal request for box holder information directly with the postmaster in the jurisdiction where the PO box is located. This request form includes essential details such as the box holder’s name and address, the requester’s capacity (process server, attorney, etc.), relevant statutes or regulations, and details about other involved parties or the court handling the case. This method is typically authorized through a pre-litigation request and must adhere to legal and privacy regulations.

2. Covert Tracking Device Mailing:

While potentially controversial, mailing a tracking device (GPS, AirTag, Tile, etc.) to the PO box is a method often used for investigative purposes. The idea is to time the mailing to coincide with the likelihood of the box holder going home or to their office. If successful, the tracking device can lead investigators to the person’s residence or primary location. It’s essential to ensure the legality of this method and to avoid privacy law violations.

3. Strategic Use of Warranty Card:

Sending a warranty card for a product owned by the individual or company with the PO box is another method. By structuring the wording carefully and offering incentives, such as extended warranties or additional products, the subject is encouraged to fill out the card. Importantly, the wording should explicitly mention that PO box addresses are not accepted, ensuring that the provided address is a physical location.

Additional Considerations:

  • Electronic Contact for Geolocation: Employing an electronic contact method, such as sending a rebate form or QR code, can be used to ping the location of the party. Creating a website with an incentive for the subject to visit, monitoring server logs, and extracting geolocation data can be an effective strategy. This method requires a physical response from the subject, making it less intrusive.
  • Legal and Ethical Considerations: Emphasize the importance of legality and ethical considerations throughout the investigative process. Privacy laws, Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) compliance, and state-specific regulations must be taken into account. Seeking legal advice from an attorney is essential before employing any of these methods.

Uncovering the ownership information or contact details of a party using a PO box demands a nuanced and legal approach. By leveraging these methods judiciously and ethically, investigators can enhance their ability to trace individuals or companies and overcome the challenges posed by those hiding behind a seemingly anonymous mailing address. As always, legality, ethical considerations, and adherence to privacy laws should guide investigative efforts.

Share Your Insights:

If you have questions, comments, or additional insights on discovering information behind PO boxes or related investigative techniques, feel free to share them in the comments section below. Your experiences and perspectives contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of these investigative strategies. Don’t forget to subscribe for future videos and updates.